![]() ![]() Many programs are simply not what I am after. SInce some people keep asking and suggesting other programs, I must stop you right now: I don't intend to try programs just because they are there, there must be a stringent justification for me to spend time on them. Gave me a new influx of energy to start actively maintaining a website. I trust that the pages are looking OK or that someone will warn me if not. Parsing the notes for rendering as a website is done by my own program, and I must confess that I barely look at it. After a while I got used to referencing citations just by looking at the citation key in Zotero, and I use Zettlr even more sporadically, just for equation-heavy work. ) that require more equations and proper handling of citations, I use Zettlr directly. But if I need to take literature notes (such as So in the end, I've reached a compromise: I take These two features are, in my opinion, killer additions to a proper note-taking software. This is not included in Obsidian and probably it'll never be, since their target customers are elsewhere. Which means it bundles some very nice features: itīibliographic databases straight out of Zotero I find searching through notes easier on Obsidian. That means that a lot of the effort is put into rendering the notes, while for me that is not a feature.īecause I render the notes as a website with my custom script, I am interested in a tool that helps me author notes, find links, organize my thoughts. You can export notes to different formats, and more. On the other hand, Zettlr could fall into the category of an authoring tool for end products, such as a report, a paper or even a book. I like the simple interface that does not get in the way. My favorite to use on a daily basis is Obsidian It may sound like a minor feature, but it is great to quickly find orphan notes, put several together and understand our thoughts by proximity. They both support quick links with the wikilink format, although Zettlr offers a bit more of configuration on how they look like (adding text, referencing by title, etc.) Obsidian offers bidirectional links, and a network graph to see how notes are linked to each other. Obsidian is more minimalistic than Zettlr. It is worth noting that since files are stored locally with a common format, there's no risk regarding the continuity of my project in case either of them disappears from one day to the other. Although it is free to use with some premium features. Is not open source and probably will never be. I have actually used parts of the code of Zettlr to understand how to parse markdown and render this website. But they are different to each other and that is what I wanted to discuss.Ĭhoosing technology based on their incentives I have explored different programs, and none reaches to the level of either I know this is not for everyone, but I am confident it is the same workflow for The kind of note I would take on a phone is the kind of note I take on paper. I take notes always when I am at my desk. I don't need to take notes on my phone and have them ready on my computer. The first few requirements are based on my own workflow. No forcing of organizational hierarchy or structure Supports easy linking (such a as wikilinks) In a format that guarantees long-term compatibility (such as Markdown) After experimenting for some time, I narrowed down the list of requirements for the software I use to take notes: , I had to look around for tools I felt confident using in the long run. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |